“It can be a lot simpler for buyers if there was one nutrient profiling system towards which all the businesses are in contrast,” mentioned Meg Jones-Monteiro, senior program director for well being fairness for the Interfaith Center on Corporate Responsibility. “It makes it tougher for buyers to match how one firm is doing versus one other when the measures should not even the identical.”
The heart’s members embrace pension funds, faith-based organizations, asset managers and foundations with $4 trillion in managed belongings. Food and diet fall beneath well being fairness on the heart, and buyers observe meals producers, meals retailers and informal restaurant chains.
Jones-Monteiro mentioned investor members of the interfaith heart fascinated by meals points discover assessments by ATNI helpful.
ATNI’s assessment discovered that 70 % of the 11,000 merchandise reviewed had increased ranges of salt, sugar and fats and never sufficient fiber, entire grains or different nutrition-rich components. The merchandise scored low on the Health Star Rating, a system that makes use of an algorithm to grade packaged meals and drinks on their dietary content material. The Australian and New Zealand governments developed the system.
The report additionally checked out advertising and marketing practices, labeling, help for workforce diet packages, accessibility and lobbying and outreach on public well being points. Unilever had the best rating throughout all classes and Coca-Cola the bottom.
https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJvbGxjYWxsLmNvbS8yMDIyLzEwLzI3L251dHJpdGlvbi1hZHZvY2F0ZXMtd2FudC1pbnZlc3RvcnMtdG8taW1wcm92ZS1mb29kLXNlY3Rvci1wcmFjdGljZXMv0gEA?oc=5
